Notes of Decisions
Constitutional
Retirement contributions made on behalf of partners is money that the partners would otherwise receive in their share of the net profits of the partnership, and the contributions are made, at least theoretically, at the election of the partners. On the other hand, when an employer makes contributions to an employes retirement plan, the contributions are not made by reducing the employes salary, and the employe is given no control over whether the contributions are to be made. Furthermore, the employe does not actually or constructively receive the contributions because the receipt of benefits under the retirement plan could be subject to substantial limitations and restrictions. There is, therefore, a legitimate and nonarbitrary reason for distinguishing between partners and employes, thus rendering the Department of Revenues regulations constitutional. Smith v. Commonwealth, 684 A.2d 647 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996).
Partnerships
Because partners acquire the status of self-employed individuals, any contributions to a retirement plan are not expenses related to the production of income, and therefore, may not be deducted from the partnerships net profits. Smith v. Commonwealth, 684 A.2d 647 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996).