Notes of Decisions
A claimant who is not provided with a report of an examiner who rules in favor of the claimant is not harmed by the omission so as to require reversal or remand of a Board decision reversing the examiner. Luckhardt v. State Employes Retirement Board, 459 A.2d 1347 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1983).
Cross References
This section cited in 4 Pa. Code § 265.2 (relating to level I review); 4 Pa. Code § 265.4 (relating to appeals—level III); 12 Pa. Code § 11.14 (relating to presiding officer); 22 Pa. Code § 121.9 (relating to administrative loan collection review procedures); 22 Pa. Code § 121.10 (relating to administrative wage garnishment procedures for Federal loans); 22 Pa. Code § 201.11 (relating to proposed opinion and recommendation); 22 Pa. Code § 351.1 (relating to purpose and scope); 31 Pa. Code § 56.1 (relating to applicability of general rules); 31 Pa. Code § 56.2 (relating to adjudication procedure); 34 Pa. Code § 3a.9 (relating to suspension or revocation of Pennsylvania inspector commission); 34 Pa. Code § 111.18 (relating to decisions of the Board); 34 Pa. Code § 131.60 (relating to resolution hearings); 34 Pa. Code § 131.111 (relating to decisions of judges); 34 Pa. Code § 401.14 (relating to decertification or refusal to certify); 34 Pa. Code § 501.8 (relating to hearings/appeals); 37 Pa. Code § 21.61 (relating to hearing examiner’s recommendation); 52 Pa. Code § 5.531 (relating to certification of record without decision); 52 Pa. Code § 1005.202 (relating to certification of record without decision); 55 Pa. Code § 41.191 (relating to determinations and recommendations by the Bureau); and 67 Pa. Code § 491.11 (relating to proposed report).
