DAUPHIN COUNTY Promulgation of Local Rules; No. AO-29 CR 2007 (1793-1989) and No. 4-22 MD 2007 [37 Pa.B. 4618]
[Saturday, August 25, 2007]Order And Now, this 8th day of August, 2007, Dauphin County Local Rule 573 is amended as follows:
Rule 573. [Discovery in Child Abuse/Assault Cases] Discovery of Children and Youth Records in Non-Dependency Cases
Pursuant to the Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6307, and the Child Protective Services Law, 23 Pa.C.S. § 6840, any party to litigation seeking discovery of confidential reports and records of Dauphin County Services for Children and Youth (Child Protective Service Agency) shall file a petition for a Show Cause Order stating with particularity the scope, necessity, and authority for the discovery sought.
The petition and rule shall be served on any adverse party, on the Dauphin County Children and Youth Agency, and on the guardian ad litem (if any) for the child.
Any objection must identify that portion of the reports of records sought to be withheld and state with particularity any privilege asserted thereto.
Thereafter, the court shall either a) schedule a hearing on the motion; or b) schedule an in-camera conference; or c) issue an order based on the averments in the motion and in any response filed thereto.
Comments Nothing in this rule shall preclude a party from filing a motion for a protective order.
Certain privileges are absolute and are not overcome by a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to cross-examine a witness or to due process of law. Examples of the foregoing are:
* Domestic Violence Advocate/Counselor
23 Pa.C.S. § 6116; V.B.T. v. Family Services of Western PA,
705 A.2d 1325 (Pa. Super. 1998)* Sexual Assault Counselor Privilege
42 Pa.C.S. § 5945; Commonwealth v. Wilson,
602 A.2d 1290 (Pa. 1992)* Psychotherapist Privilege
42 Pa.C.S. § 5944; Commonwealth v. Counterman,
719 A.2d 284 (Pa. 1998)Comment This rule was rescinded effective February 1, 2007, by passage of the amendments to the Pa. R.J.C.P.
This rule is readopted effective February 1, 2007.
This rule is intended to apply not only in criminal cases. This procedure should be used when such records are requested in custody cases or in any other civil case.
By the Court
RICHARD A. LEWIS,
President Judge[Pa.B. Doc. No. 07-1538. Filed for public inspection August 24, 2007, 9:00 a.m.]
