792 Adoption of new rule 139 of the rules of juvenile court procedure; no. 527 Supreme Court rules doc.
PART I. RULES [ 237 PA. CODE CH. 1 ] Adoption of New Rule 139 of the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure; No. 527 Supreme Court Rules Doc. [41 Pa.B. 2429]
[Saturday, May 14, 2011]Order Per Curiam
And Now, this 26th day of April, 2011, upon the recommendation of the Juvenile Court Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for public comment before adoption at 40 Pa.B. 7029 (December 11, 2010), in the Atlantic Reporter (Third Series Advance Sheets, Vol. 7, No. 2, December 24, 2010), and on the Supreme Court's web-page, and an Explanatory Report to be published with this Order:
It Is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that the adoption of New Rule 139 of the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure is approved in the following form.
This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective June 1, 2011.
Annex A TITLE 237. JUVENILE RULES PART I. RULES Subpart A. DELINQUENCY MATTERS CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS PART A. BUSINESS OF COURTS Rule 139. Use of Restraints on the Juvenile.
Restraints shall be removed prior to the commencement of a proceeding unless the court determines on the record, after providing the juvenile an opportunity to be heard, that they are necessary to prevent:
1) physical harm to the juvenile or another person;
2) disruptive courtroom behavior, evidenced by a history of behavior that created potentially harmful situations or presented substantial risk of physical harm; or
3) the juvenile, evidenced by an escape history or other relevant factors, from fleeing the courtroom.
Comment The use of any restraints, such as handcuffs, chains, shackles, irons, or straitjackets, is highly discouraged. The routine use of restraints on juveniles is a practice contrary to the philosophy of balanced and restorative justice and undermines the goals of providing treatment, supervision, and rehabilitation to juveniles. Therefore, restraints should not be used in most instances. However, there are some circumstances when juveniles need to be restrained to protect themselves and others and to maintain security in the courtroom. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 6301 for purposes of the Juvenile Act.
Official Note: Rule 139 adopted April 26, 2011, effective June 1, 2011.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
Final Report explaining the provisions of Rule 139 published with the Court's Order at 41 Pa.B. 2429 (May 14, 2011).
EXPLANATORY REPORT April 2011 The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has adopted new Rule 139 with this Recommendation. This new rule is effective June 1, 2011.
The purpose of this rule is to eliminate shackling during a court proceeding in almost every case. Only in the few extreme cases should such restraints be utilized.
The Committee considered this issue in light of the Report from the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice (ICJJ). In the ICJJ Report, the Commission asked the Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention Committee of the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency to perform a study to reduce and if possible eliminate shackling in Pennsylvania's juvenile courtrooms.1
The Committee believes it is appropriate to address the use of restraints in the courtroom and to limit the use of such restraints by Rule of Court, especially in those cases where the juvenile does not pose a risk. The Committee wants to ensure that the routine use of excessive restraints is discouraged because it is contrary to philosophy of balanced and restorative justice and undermines the goals of providing treatment, supervision, and rehabilitation to juveniles. However, there are some circumstances when juveniles should be restrained to protect themselves and others and to maintain security in the courtroom.
Pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (3), restraints may be used if it is determined that they are necessary to prevent: 1) physical harm to the juvenile or another person; 2) disruptive courtroom behavior; or 3) the juvenile from fleeing. In all three circumstances, there should be evidence that the juvenile has a history of such behavior or there are other factors present that make the juvenile very likely to pose a risk.
The Committee believes that the juvenile should be given an opportunity to comment prior to the use of restraints and that the court should make its findings on the record if restraints are utilized.
It is also important to note that this rule only affects the use of restraints in court proceedings. Sheriffs, probation officers, and other persons providing transportation of juveniles to and from detention facilities, placement facilities, and other locations may be governed by internal procedures and policies, including insurance policies, to use restraints during the transportation of juveniles. The use of restraints in those situations is governed by local policies of operation.
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 11-792. Filed for public inspection May 13, 2011, 9:00 a.m.] _______
1 Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice, Report, May 2010, at page 54.
